Is the US Losing Behind in Web3 Dominance? Crypto Lawyer Perspective

John Deaton, a lawyer specializing in blockchain technology, recently issued a warning in the form of a tweet, expressing concern that the United States may be left out of the Web3 revolution if its government continues its efforts to restrict cryptocurrencies. Deaton conveyed this opinion as he reacted to the news that the United States authorities had finally stopped the ailing and cryptocurrency-friendly Silvergate Bank operations.

Race to Crypto Revolution

The cryptocurrency attorney is certain that crypto will stay, and the United States risks slipping behind in the race to lead the revolution in cryptocurrency. Given that the United States was rapidly losing its supremacy in terms of the dollar, Deaton stated that the nation had to make haste to ensure it remained in the lead.

Sherrod Brown, a senator from the United States, was quoted in a screenshot that went viral last week. In the screenshot, he blamed the insolvency of Silvergate Bank on the volatility of cryptocurrencies, adding that the risk would spread throughout the financial system if proper safeguards were not implemented. According to the statement, “I am continuing to work with my colleagues in Congress and banking authorities to build robust protections for our financial system from the danger of crypto.”

Many specialists disagreed with the senator and said that the bankruptcy of Silvergate Bank was caused by a mismatch between demand deposits and accessible cash and that this discrepancy had nothing to do with the bank’s engagement in cryptocurrency.

Silvergate’s demand deposit dilemma

The CEO of CustodiaBank contended that if Silvergate had held $13.3 billion in cash, the bank run would not have impaired its capital. The report indicated that Silvergate had $13.3 billion in demand deposits but only $1.4 billion. This lack of liquidity could have led to a bank run, causing customers to withdraw their funds and leaving Silvergate unable to meet the demand.

Throughout the discussion, the cryptocurrency lawyer Deaton observed that the governing bodies are not interested in the truth but are more likely to push an alternative narrative that serves their purposes.

All trademarks, logos, and images displayed on this site belong to their respective owners and have been utilized under the Fair Use Act. The materials on this site should not be interpreted as financial advice. When we incorporate content from other sites, we ensure each author receives proper attribution by providing a link to the original content. This site might maintain financial affiliations with a selection of the brands and firms mentioned herein. As a result, we may receive compensation if our readers opt to click on these links within our content and subsequently register for the products or services on offer. However, we neither represent nor endorse these services, brands, or companies. Therefore, any disputes that may arise with the mentioned brands or companies need to be directly addressed with the respective parties involved. We urge our readers to exercise their own judgement when clicking on links within our content and ultimately signing up for any products or services. The responsibility lies solely with them. Please read our full disclaimer and terms of use policy here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *